No Excuses
Morning, all.
Tell you what, I hate doing match reviews after a performance like yesterday. Especially when we could all see it coming, and had done for a while. We’ve spent bloody ages on here moaning about how weak our midfield is, so the manager beefs it up with bodies. Problem is, a couple of those bodies should be nowhere near a Celtic jersey. But there they were, and here we are.
We started off a lot stronger and more aggressive than last week, forcing a few early (useless) corners and a booking for Fernandez and McInnes. But normal service was resumed, with Beaton ignoring anything in blue-including a clear second yellow when Fernandez hauled down Nygren who would have been through on goal, and a handball thankfully picked up by VAR for a second away goal. Plus all of his usual antics, including waving play on when Sterling kicked the ball straight at Duran’s head as he lay on the ground after a tackle. Walsh on VAR wasn’t going to pick that up, as he’d ignored one similar last week.
But once again, the lack of balance in the team was glaring. We were nominally three at the back, with Donovan and Tierney joining the middle men. Problem is, Donovan had no cover in front of him and CCV doesn’t have the pace to deal with a speedy winger, so the five in midfield plan was strangled at conception.
And let’s be brutally honest, the only midfielder who could hold his head high after that game was Baur. The rest stunk the place out. McGregor passed more often to blue jerseys than hooped ones, and McCowan held onto the ball just long enough to lose every challenge he faced. Tierney tried manfully down the left, and even crashed one off the bar early on, but faded badly as the game progressed. Here’s a wee Top Tip for you, Kieran. If you can’t last ninety minutes for your club, you shouldn’t be accepting international call ups. The three weeks ahead of us could be spent much more fruitfully working out a fitness regime to get you that wee bit closer to what you were. Not on a jolly jamboree abroad wi yer pals.
Anyway, the goal when it came was all too familiar. We hit the bar, they break. Ball breaks loose in the D to an unmarked player who rattles it. This time, Sinisalo saved it but they score the rebound. And it all came about because Beaton ignored a clear Kelsy handball, and we couldn’t clear our lines. Cue the sly smirk.
The interval brought Høgh on for McCowan, but it also meant Duran being stuck on the wing. And speaking of wingers,we ended up with THREE of them on the pitch. Can’t get too much of a good thing, huh? We actually gave it a good go in the last ten or fifteen minutes, but by then we were kidding ourselves on. We could have played all day and not scored. Fuxake, we could have stayed on the pitch at half time and still not scored. Might as well have done too for all the good the legendary pep talk did.
It’s been an awful week, three games that we’ve never once looked like winning. We have a mixture of good, bad and indifferent players. Some who simply are not good enough, some who just need a rub of the green, one or two whose future is well behind them. That’s not a squad that is anywhere near good enough for ANY European competition, and is struggling to cope with the domestic stuff. We are miles short of where we were only a couple of years ago, and more like a clapped out old Lada than a Honda Civic. Dreams of watching a Ferrari purr along at Celtic Park are about as likely to happen as one being parked in my driveway.
Our moustachioed heid honcho managed to shift the blame for all of last year’s problems onto our manager at the time, whose only crime was to publicly point out the paucity of quality in the squad. The usual suspects queued up to put the boot in as well, and I wonder what they are all thinking at the moment. BR complained that he was being obstructed in his efforts to improve the squad. MON has made similar, though less spectacular, claims. We have lost three games in eight days, and to sides which should never have been able to lay a glove on us. And wouldn’t, if the Plc was the least bit interested in the alleged core business of the club. We face an uphill struggle in Europe with a squad which is chronically short of quality, and are now only two points clear of the Ibrox mob.
Not because they are a good team. They aren’t. But because we have been systematically shorn of quality right across the board. And speaking of boards, it is our board who are responsible for the squad being short, but O’Neill has to take responsibility for the players he put on the pitch. As for the players themselves, they should be forced to watch the last three games a la Clockwork Orange until the very thought of performing that badly again has them screaming for mercy.
An international break has never been so welcome, words I thought I’d never say.
<><><><><><>
Above article by BMCUWP
San Luis
September 23, 2026 3:41 pm
Celtic is not a typical football club.
In fact it has three characteristics which would have made it is pretty much uniquely attractive to Mr Desmond:-
it’s funded almost entirely by the fans, who are fanatically loyal (a loyalty that can be easily exploited).
it offered the prospect of moving to the EPL which would have resulted in an enormous increase in the value of his investment
a move to the EPL would have made him a national hero in Ireland thus raising his esteem among his peer group (the Coolmore Mafia).
Things didn’t pan out how he’d hoped, particularly when the huns went out of business. Luckily that unfortunate event has been overcome and hardly anyone mentions it now. But it did serve as a wake up call for how vulnerable and precarious The Old Firm thing is, which, if that still offers benefit to Celtic needs to be protected. How best to protect it? Well one thing is clear, it has been protected. Have Celtic played a part in that? Opinions vary.
Mike in Toronto
September 23, 2026 4:56 pm
Reading back
there is ample discussion about MON being one of many who invested in those film schemes and then sued their banks and financial advisors. The lawsuits are a fact. It takes 10 seconds on Google to find John Hughes blog in which he says those financial issues were then reason MON came back. You might not believe it but to suggest it isnt being reported is disingenuous.
————————-
But John and numerous bloggers do not know the facts.
Pure specualtion and negative spin.
Quite disrespectful to MON.
Saint Stivs,
All this published stuff about MON is about a tax bill that crystalized over ten years ago. I’d imagine that has been well taken care of by now Martin might have been left with an unexpected large bill to pay then but nothing that hasn’t been easily taken care of by the man himself by now.
I agree with you it’s smear territory.
Thanks for the well wishes lads .
Really appreciated 👍
HH 🍀
As an intelligent man of means he’s hardly going to sink his entire wealth into a scheme that sinks him.
Distraction tactics.
Re Celtic Accounts
Based on Celtic’s newly published figures, the UEFA 70% rule would appear to allow around £89m of annual squad costs for 2025/26. There is not yet enough detail in the preliminary accounts to establish exactly how much of that Celtic actually used. That will be a follow up although the accounts in the past have not separated admin staff costs from identifiable player squad cost as Rangers accounts do (why Celtic do not is a question for shareholders) so a bit of estimating will be involved.
ernie lynch
September 23, 2026 5:03 pm
San Luis
September 23, 2026 3:41 pm
Celtic is not a typical football club.
In fact it has three characteristics which would have made it is pretty much uniquely attractive to Mr Desmond:-
it’s funded almost entirely by the fans, who are fanatically loyal (a loyalty that can be easily exploited).
it offered the prospect of moving to the EPL which would have resulted in an enormous increase in the value of his investment
a move to the EPL would have made him a national hero in Ireland thus raising his esteem among his peer group (the Coolmore Mafia).
Things didn’t pan out how he’d hoped, particularly when the huns went out of business. Luckily that unfortunate event has been overcome and hardly anyone mentions it now. But it did serve as a wake up call for how vulnerable and precarious The Old Firm thing is, which, if that still offers benefit to Celtic needs to be protected. How best to protect it? Well one thing is clear, it has been protected. Have Celtic played a part in that? Opinions vary.
=============
The evidence from previous accounts that Celtic kept pretty much in step with what Rangers spent on players, suggests Celtic did play a part although so too might have been the need to keep the SPFL as a competitive league.
saint stivs
September 23, 2026 5:07 pm
Mike in Toronto
September 23, 2026 4:56 pm
Reading back
there is ample discussion about MON being one of many who invested in those film schemes and then sued their banks and financial advisors. The lawsuits are a fact. It takes 10 seconds on Google to find John Hughes blog in which he says those financial issues were then reason MON came back. You might not believe it but to suggest it isnt being reported is disingenuous.
————————-
But John and numerous bloggers do not know the facts.
Pure specualtion and negative spin.
Quite disrespectful to MON.
==============
I questioned JH motivation at the time on X. Ended up being blocked.
ernie lynch
September 23, 2026 9:42 am
Yup and could result in an uncompetitive league that supporters and TV lose interest in.
San Luis
September 23, 2026 10:39 am
The cost cutting started right after the Lask game. Loans do not come with a big transfer fee amortised over the length of contract say 3 or 4 years. Just loan fee and wages for a year,
Players on loan are usually available for two reasons:
They have not developed to first team level of their owner club because they need time to mature
or
they have been with owner club for a while and are not first team ready so offloaded.
IIV
Please stop using ‘the mute’ will you.
If I was a loan player like Mheuka I’d be on to my club wanting a move to a less dysfunctional outfit.
We are a shambles.
Playing dross like Tounetki ahead of him whilst we chase a game is enough of a reason.
One of a catalogue of unfathomable decisions made by our kindly but out of touch manager and his gormless sidekick.
INIQUITOUS IV
September 22, 2026 2:31 pm
There is a different narrative being floated that the CFO had the final say on signings.
Based on that narrative I developed a new one.
I have a theory on poor recruitment which is linked to FSR.
The one guy at Celtic who should understand the impact of FSR on Celtic is the CFO who played a part in its development.
Celtic since 2022 when FSR was introduced, but whose policy of sustainable spend goes back to 2004, has seen Celtic spend well below the FSR ceilings on players. What is not spent is profit.
If the CFO’s kpi is measured by profit then the CFO benefits from not spending more on players.
I arrived at this theory from something I saw the other day about CFO sticking to old principles needed when Celtic were in debt.
This is the reason I harp on about purpose.
We need a crystal clear statement on the purpose of Celtic followed by the plans and policies to execute it.
See you on the 9th
Ex Machina
September 23, 2026 6:22 pm
Playing Tounetki ahead of me is inexplicable
Mike in Toronto
September 22, 2026 2:23 pm
What saw Rangers liquidated was spending on high wages for players to make Rangers competitive instead of paying HMRC. The latter wanted paid instead.
Part of SDM’s Testimony to FTT in 2010. pages 125, 126,127
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B62m3ggkEX2Ray05cjY3TXktbjA/view?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-_Yr5Z2kxF7dPPc1QV-2SPA
Pity LNS was never presented with it re no sporting advantage decision.
saint stivs
September 22, 2026 3:27 pm
The Celtic Player app is the perfect vehicle for surveys etc. They could do Jobo’s MoM on it as well a set the record straight on false narratives on social media.
Auldlheid
Yes, the immediate dropping of interest in specific targets was a clear indication of that
In general terms, given we operate in Scotland and rarely qualify for CL, I really have no problem in cutting our cloth accordingly. We really don’t need to be paying anyone £50k per week at Celtic and if we are to get rid of the high earners, so be it …but I don’t just mean off the team sheet, I also mean the boardroom.
Furthermore, I’d close the Celtic superstores, except the stadium one, and put everything onto online sales. That’s where fashion exists now. Ask Bohemians of Dublin.
Finally, I’d get rid of the B team and take it out of that league and go back to having a 20 man reserve squad with Maloney back in pathway role, introducing guaranteed first team minutes and a wage structure to compete with English clubs. I’d rather pay our young prospects £5k p/w than give Tounetki £20k.
Auldheid
Indeed. Particularly as he was hooked at ht in the Ibrox game for being totally ineffective.
Your FSR hunch may well have some merit.
The support, providing the vast majority of the company’s working capital, are being hoodwinked/ trolled at best and possibly deliberately misled by the Board.
Nicholson, McKay are an effective, well remunerated shield for the major shareholders to preserve substantial equity value in the plc even though fc growth and development are being undermined. Personal gain at the expense of
Prioritising the best interests of the main purpose of the company – a football club.
An independent review of fiduciary governance could be very revealing. Systemic downgrading covered up by a blame culture of football department failure. Deliberate sabotage – poor appointments, deliberate delaying tactics on recruitment etc.
MIT…”The Board seem to think they are doing great. Many fans seem to disagree. And most seem to think it is fair to question the Boards’ actions. The Board seems to take great umbrage at anyone questioning what they do or how they do it. Increasingly, even those who criticize the Board say no one should question or criticize the conduct of the fans who financially prop up the same Board they are criticizing.
isnt there an inconsistency there?”
Mike, I’d suggest there would be an inconsistency if there was only one reason for attending games, or subscribing to Celtic TV or buying merch but we all know that there are many and varied reasons for doing it. But then, you are really too smart not to know that! 😉
STEVENAIVE
I will cease and desist. I lazily gravitated from using the term as an adjective to describe one individual. Using it as a noun is indeed inappropriè or dèplacè.
HH
INIQUITOUS IV😊
McCaff
you keep telling me how smart I am, and then disagreeing with me. So, obviously, one of us is not as smart as you think we are.😆
From the Parkhead Faithful.
𝗧𝗛𝗜𝗦 𝗖𝗘𝗟𝗧𝗜𝗖 𝗕𝗢𝗔𝗥𝗗 𝗔𝗥𝗘 𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗬𝗘𝗧 𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗥 𝗠𝗔𝗡𝗔𝗚𝗘𝗥 𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗗𝗥𝗬
Celtic’s recruitment has become a serious issue.
I find it absolutely astounding that we signed 10 players during the summer and only two of them started against Rangers at the weekend.
We have constantly been told by those running the club that the aim is to come out of every transfer window stronger than we went into it. But can anyone seriously argue that has happened recently?
The last three transfer windows in particular have left us with effectively the same core group of players we had when Brendan Rodgers returned. Bar one or two positions, we simply haven’t improved the starting XI.
And the evidence is staring us in the face. Another transfer window has passed, yet many of the same players we have been crying out to upgrade or provide serious competition for are still starting the biggest games.
Look at Jordan Lotomba and Oliver Sørensen as examples. We bring these players into the club and then, when the biggest domestic game comes around, they’re completely excluded from the matchday squad. What does that tell you?
It’s beginning to look like a mirror image of previous windows. We get towards the end of the window, panic sets in, and suddenly we’re bringing in bodies to fill out the squad rather than players capable of immediately improving the starting XI. The pattern is becoming impossible to ignore.
We’re caught in a vicious cycle of signing large numbers of players, only for several of them to quickly fall out of the picture. Then we’re left relying on the exact same core group of players that the recruitment was supposedly designed to improve upon in the first place.
And then we have the Celtic board coming out and effectively saying they’re backing Martin O’Neill. But what does “backing the manager” actually mean if it’s only words? How have they backed him?
If you don’t deliver the manager’s top targets who fit the way he wants to play, and instead leave him with last-minute loan deals and inexperienced teenagers, in what world is that properly backing your manager?
Backing a manager isn’t releasing a statement after three consecutive defeats saying everyone is going to come together and support him.
Backing your manager is giving him the tools to succeed BEFORE the problems arrive.
It’s identifying the weaknesses in the squad, getting his priority targets through the door and giving him players capable of immediately improving the starting XI.
Going into derbies and major European matches with little contribution from your new signings raises serious questions about the people responsible for recruitment.
Yes, football is emotional. Supporters will blame managers, tactics, formations and individual players and managers absolutely have to take responsibility for their own decisions and performances.
But time and time again, I don’t believe this board has given Celtic managers the tools required to do their jobs to the best of their ability.
For me, the recruitment record over a number of years simply hasn’t been good enough. You only need to look at the core of our starting XI over that period. It doesn’t change anywhere near enough because too many of the players brought in supposedly to challenge or replace established starters ultimately fail to do so.
At some point, accountability has to go beyond the manager.
I believe this board is holding Celtic back. They may completely disagree with that and genuinely believe their strategy is the correct one, but supporters are entitled to look at the recruitment, the European performances and the continued reliance on the same core players and question where this is heading.
If those running Celtic cannot address these repeated failures, then for the good of the club, I believe they should seriously consider whether it is time for change at boardroom level. Managers come and go but the recruitment problems remain.
@Auldheid – September 23, 2026 7:23 pm
“What saw Rangers liquidated was spending on high wages for players to make Rangers competitive instead of paying HMRC. The latter wanted paid instead.”
There is some subtly to the point here and I think that’s what MIT was alluding to.
Rangers used EBTs to lower their expenses (by not paying as much tax), and in doing so permitted them to allocate more of their earnings (which they would not have otherwise had) towards paying wages (which they would not have otherwise been able to afford).
They created a fiction as to the team they could put out on the park with the revenue streams they had.
However, within this fiction (and even if it was at the extreme side of a company’s risk appetite), they were able to pay their wages and remain solvent (Whyte selling future receivables to Ticketus for liquidity today; Barcelona have entered into similar arrangements).
What sunk Rangers was the ‘black swan event’ of HMRC finding out about their dodgy dealings, determining they constituted disguised remuneration (i.e. tax avoidance) and turning up at the front door with a tax bill (+ interest) of £49m+, due and payable today.
You’re insolvent.
Now, the important points from our perspective (leaving aside the clear case of gaining a sporting advantage / submitting fraudulent player information to the SFA – both of which should have resulted in title stripping) are:
The subtly here is in the context of how the Celtic executives point to Rangers and try to use them as an example of what may happen to the Club if we ‘overspend’.
Rangers did not take out a large loan which they were unable to service, with the bank tipping them into liquidation; they did not award large contracts to players which they ran out of cashflow to service, tipping them into administration; they did not agree to large transfer fees which they could not service when the next instalment was due; they existed within the fiction they built, until that fiction crumbled around them in an instant by the posting of a tax bill.
Celtic directors would have you believe that the means of Rangers demise is relevant to Celtic. It is not. But they cling to it as a justification for our overly conservative financial policy and their own inability to adequately manage risk and reward.
If any of you follow any of the ManU podcasts the conversations are absolutely identical to those happening at Celtic, you could virtually change the team names and the converstion would be identical, common issues being:
lack of coaching / poor coaching / lost the dressing room / x,y,z lined up as a replacement / poor recruitment / director of football / Ratcliffe/Desmond / lack of desire / no heart / lack of running / jogging back / not pressing / no tackling etc.etc.
The similarities are many even down to the billionaire owners, each of which seems like a tight-arsed billionaire who gets little joy out of life and who will definitely be the richest man in their graveyard. Sad really. Imagine the heroes those guys would be if they had the vision to spend some coin, but hey they got there by being tight-arses and will not change.
What was an eye-opener last week in ManU-Fulham was that the Fulham players on average ran 4k more than the ManU players in the same game. Neville said a 15min period in that game was the worst he had ever seen ManU play.
Rooney believes the root cause is the players just aren’t good enough and recruitment is to blame. They overpaid for poor players that aren’t going to change the direction of travel. Interesting hearing a fellow pro talking so disparagingly about ManU players.
I believe it is the same with Celtic. The only players I think worth holding onto in the group are Scales / Ralston / Forrest – simply because they always turn-up. Scales + Ralston are not the best players but when they are played they give their all. Same with JF, even tho it is only 20-30mins these days. Donovan may also fall into this category. The rest are all journeymen, some of whom may be better or worse than others but could easily be replaced with sensible recruitment.
DUBAIBHOY
Fergie’s greatest achievement in management might have been getting that 2013 side over the line to win the title. Everyone knew that the squad needed a total rebuild that summer. They gave Moyes £30m. The rest is history. Including the fact that over a billion has been spent because of that one mistake, and they are still nowhere near rectifying it.
Auldheid
So the whole paradigm was to save Rangers from a failed SPL?
“suggests Celtic did play a part although so too might have been the need to keep the SPFL as a competitive league.”
Do you mean a Celtic league?
like it was up till now?
The moment Desmond decided what his position was re the death of the hun, then that was always going to be perceived as our position – we are quite happy to drop our trousers for years, and in Mowbray style, take it somewhere a bit more painful than the chin.
BY our silence on the truth, it makes us look, weak and dishonest. Celtic (and other clubs) should have at least made it clear they were very puzzled at how the authorities were looking to treat the Huns end.
What Desmond done was sickening, and gave me one of my least favourite moments in nearly half a century of following our great club.
We are a very special club, and much loved the world over, but people like Desmond are eroding all that.
When the Desmond’s got their claws into the club we had a team that was actually good enough to win European trophies, with a forward line that boasted enough firepower to to beat any team on the planet ..in fact if we played ANYONE in Paradise, we were confident of beating them
Since then Desmond & Co were quite happy to leave the Celtic manger with Jonny Kenny and Daizen Maeda as our whole forward line …that’s the level of downsizing they’ve implemented and overseen.
Oh you’ll hear they are all big Celtic men.
How we always aim to come out of each transfer window stronger than when we went in. can you tell me how to marry both those things? From a top European team, to being unable to beat minnows to qualify for the CL, while telling you we aim to come out out of each window stronger.
Larsson, Sutton & Hartson -To- Johnny Kenny, Maeda and young Osmand, a lad just starting to play his first pro games.
This is how easily and comfortably they talk pish to us now – they basically treat us like we are incapable of thinking for ourseves.
That enough of us will always buy the shit they’re selling…like being world class in everything they do.
Desmond might admire the Huns till his heart’s content, I just wish he’d find somewhere else to do it cos I can’t stand to see the rat bastard’s face.
LIke it or not, and in spite of what his lackeys (Who are having to work harder than ever to defend him) these things are going to be his Celtic legacy, when it could have been about success.
He’s only getting exactly what he deserves for his decision making.
Just Like Tom Thumb’s Blues
September 23, 2026 9:23 pm
I get the legal view but in using EBTS in a manner not open to other clubs unless they too took a risk andused side letters, starting with the DOS ebts that are a part of what they owed HMRC, Rangers only postponed the tax bill that eventually arrived and sunk them.
Why use ebts rather than pay the same tax Celtic did if it was not in pursuit of football success that gave them entry to the CL?
I am quite happy with the way Celtic framed it as in to point out that ultimately Rangers behaviour, which was spending money they had not legitimately earned by fair means, led to them having to pay up what they should have paid in the begining.
We should not let current dissatisfaction at the Celtic Board lead us to rewriting history on a legal nicety.
That is how LNS Doncaster and SFA were able to justify the same club narrative. Sod morality.
Margaret McGill
September 24, 2026 12:11 am
Auldheid
So the whole paradigm was to save Rangers from a failed SPL?
“suggests Celtic did play a part although so too might have been the need to keep the SPFL as a competitive league.”
Do you mean a Celtic league?
like it was up till now?
============
Not the whole paradigm just one explanation why Celtic did not spend more to buy players than they had to.
Looking at the playing squad of 2012/13 or 2013/14 shows a few players who would walk into the current squad today but not on same wages as they would command now.
Celtic 2012-13 Scottish Premiership Squad – ESPN (UK)
Another point for those who stopped paying to watch Celtic: with the advantage of realising as result of how Res 12 and LNS was handled, that the game was bereft of sporting integrity and corrupt I stopped financial support a number of years ago.
The emotional support is still there, which is why I make an effort to see Celtic change and become a club I would pay to support.
The rat Desmond was more than happy to go along with the big lie that Rangers never ceased to exist, in fact he went out his way to tell us how great they are.
Because all the rats and snakes wanted any Rangers around, this sadly became the club’s position. The first time we played them post-liquidation the ticket and programme said we were playing Rangers.
No questions asked!
That is what has happened, and no amount of lies, mental gymnastics of rewriting of history will change that.
The whole of Scottish football went along with the blatant lie Rangers just changed company, not football club.
Desmond and his lackeys aren’t just up to their knees in that lie, they are literally choking and drowning in it.
We are run by greedy, sneaky rats, aided by slippery snakes who lie so effortlessly it’s something to behold.
They all make my skin crawl.
Let’s see what this current league battle means to them cause I’ve a feeling they wouldn’t be too unhappy if the Huns win. Last season they literally done everything in their power to weaken the team to the point we were losing the league to hearts.
Multiple years of failing to fill one of the specialist places in the team, which in turn leaves the whole spine of the team weak and vulnerable.
If we had bought quality at no5 & no6 this summer, we would currently be gearing up for the champions league and would have had a better chance to win the treble.
They didn’t supply the manager with his preferred targets, AGAIN, which meant us not making the CL again and the treble is already gone.
We now appear to be in shock and crisis, a crisis that quickly follows on from our last crisis last season.
This is how the Desmond’s are running our club – stumbling from one crisis to the next.
New article posted
https://sentinelcelts.com/2026/09/24/look-after-the-pennies-and-the-pounds-look-after-themselves/
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/19cuwTZrbt/
Dublin airport strike again